Skip to content

PR Firms Influence and Regularly Hinder Climate Change Policy Formulation

Retailers such as Edelman wield influence comparable to that of think tanks, corporations, and non-governmental organizations.

Climate Change Policies Manipulated and Frequently Hindered by Public Relations Firms
Climate Change Policies Manipulated and Frequently Hindered by Public Relations Firms

PR Firms Influence and Regularly Hinder Climate Change Policy Formulation

In a significant development, large public relations firms are actively influencing the terms of the climate change debate, a role traditionally held by climate scientists. This shift is driven by consumer demand for immediate action to curb greenhouse gas emissions and combat environmental degradation.

Brands are now focusing on discussing their approaches to addressing climate change issues, with consumers increasingly expecting transparency and genuine commitment from them. Large PR firms are working to address these demands, crafting responses for brands regarding their environmental efforts.

A study published this week by Brown University in the scientific journal Climatic Change highlights this role of public relations agencies, positioning them as the marketing industry's equivalent of think tanks in relation to climate policy. The research reveals that these firms have a substantial role in climate policy, akin to think tanks.

However, the study also sheds light on a more concerning aspect. Large PR firms, often representing fossil fuel interests, have been found to influence the climate change debate and policy by engaging in campaigns that sow doubt about climate science, promote "greenwashing," and lobby extensively to delay or obstruct government action.

This strategy involves shaping public perception to portray climate change as uncertain or non-urgent and framing corporate efforts as environmentally responsible despite ongoing fossil fuel dependence. The Brown University study aligns with broader research showing that major PR firms working for big oil and gas corporations orchestrate disinformation campaigns and greenwashing strategies.

These PR-driven efforts are part of a larger pattern documented across political and communication research: fossil fuel companies spend billions on lobbying and political contributions to politicians opposing strong environmental regulations, influencing both public discourse and policy outcomes.

While the Brown University initiative focuses more on education policy intersecting with climate change, the broader academic conversation shows how PR firms contribute to polarization and framing battles in the climate debate. They affect problem definition and agenda-setting phases by emphasizing nationalist rhetoric or economic risks to undermine consensus on urgent climate actions.

In summary, large public relations firms influence climate change debate and policy chiefly by: - Crafting disinformation and doubt about climate science to confuse public understanding - Promoting greenwashing to improve fossil fuel companies’ public image while delaying real transition - Lobbying intensively through political contributions and government engagement to block or weaken climate policy - Helping frame the climate discourse to foster polarization and inhibit effective collective action

This synthesis corresponds with the patterns illustrated by Brown University’s research context and related studies on climate communication, lobbying, and corporate influence in climate policy. The new research from Brown University further underscores the significant role public relations agencies play in shaping the public discourse about climate change.

  1. In the realm of environmental science, a growing number of businesses are focusing on discussing their approaches to addressing climate change issues, showcasing a demand for transparency and genuine commitment from brands.
  2. questioned by the Brown University study, large PR firms, who often represent fossil fuel interests, have been found to influence climate change discourse and policy by engaging in campaigns that sow doubt about climate science, promoting "greenwashing," and lobbying extensively to delay or obstruct government action.
  3. Consequently, the finance sector, particularly businesses and brands, need to closely examine their relationships with PR firms to ensure alignment with their commitment to environmental responsibility, with consumers increasingly valuing authentic environmental commitment.

Read also:

    Latest