Lawsuit Challenges EPA's Cancellation of $7B 'Solar for All' Program
A lawsuit has been filed against the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its administrator Lee Zeldin. The suit challenges the EPA's decision to cancel the USD 7 billion 'Solar for All' program, which aimed to bring solar power to over 900,000 low-income households nationwide. Environmental groups and businesses have criticized the move, citing significant financial losses and job cuts.
The lawsuit alleges violations of the Administrative Procedure Act and the US Constitution's separation of powers. It argues that the EPA's repeal of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund cannot retroactively extinguish already allocated grants. Congress had previously guaranteed the funds for the program, but the EPA terminated it nonetheless. Environmental groups claim the decision betrays low-income families and communities.
EPA administrator Lee Zeldin defends the decision, stating the EPA no longer has the authority to administer the program. However, the program's termination has resulted in substantial financial losses for businesses and job losses for workers in the solar industry.
The lawsuit seeks to reverse the EPA's decision and restore funding for the Solar for All program. The outcome will have significant implications for low-income families, businesses, and the broader solar industry. The case is ongoing, with a hearing scheduled for later this year.