Detrimental Tax on Skill Games Threatens Small Businesses in Pennsylvania, Benefiting Large Casino Sector

Detrimental Tax on Skill Games Threatens Small Businesses in Pennsylvania, Benefiting Large Casino Sector

New Article:

The Debate over Skill Games and Commercial Casinos in Pennsylvania: A Fresh Approach to Support Small Businesses

The Pennsylvania government needs a more thoughtful approach to tackling the state's persistent fiscal deficit than pummeling small businesses with excessive taxes on so-called "skill games." These arcade-like devices, found in various places like bars, convenience stores, and laundromats, serve as a lifeline for many small establishments and community institutions.

"Skill games" are electronic gadgets that, according to Pennsylvania state courts, require a minimal degree of "skill" – usually well-timed button-pushing – to separate them from traditional slot machines, thereby not qualifying as gambling.

Here's the lowdown on the skirmish between skill games and commercial casinos in the Keystone State:

Regulation and Taxation of Skill Games:

Senator Gene Yaw of Pennsylvania has once again presented legislation (Senate Bill 1122 / SB626) to establish guidelines for skill games, which differ from slot machines in that they rely on player skill rather than pure luck. The bill proposes licensing for operators, distributors, and host locations such as bars, clubs, and retail stores.

The proposed tax rate for skill games is a much friendlier 16%, the same as slot machines at Pennsylvania casinos (considerably lower than the approximately 54% levied on commercial casinos). Restrictions include age verification, gambling resource information, and limiting the number of machines per establishment. Licensing fees and taxes are substantially lower compared to those for casinos.

Commercial Casinos:

Pennsylvania's commercial casinos are laden with taxes, with slot machines subject to a gross revenue tax rate around 54%, a stark contrast to the proposed 16% tax on skill games. Casinos are licensed and stringently regulated under Pennsylvania gambling laws, with a comprehensive regulatory framework overseeing a vast array of gaming activities. However, the licensing and operational requirements for casinos are much more extensive and costly than those suggested for skill games.

The Impact on Small Businesses and Local Communities

The proposed legislation is geared towards assisting smaller businesses by allowing them to host skill games as a secondary income stream. A limited number of games per establishment could bring in additional revenue without the high licensing and tax burdens faced by casinos. The modest annual hosting fee and regulated game density aim to keep participation feasible for smaller community institutions.

However, some commercial casinos fear that the legalization and regulation of skill games might drain their customer base and revenue, potentially diminishing the state's significant gaming revenue base. Concerns over underage play and problem gambling in unsupervised skill games also persist. The bill plans to address these issues with ID verification and tighter regulation.

In summary, Pennsylvania's proposed regulation and taxation for skill games presents a lower tax rate (16%) and lighter licensing requirements compared to commercial casinos (slot machines taxed at ~54%). This framework targets small businesses and community organizations, potentially boosting their revenue while ensuring some state tax revenue from previously untaxed gaming machines. The implications include increased support for small businesses and local communities, but the initiative faces opposition from commercial casinos worried about revenue loss. The legislation also strives to mitigate risks of underage gambling and illegal operations through enforcement and age verification measures.

1. The proposed legislation for skill games, seen in Senate Bill 1122/SB626, aims to support small businesses like laundromats and bars by allowing them to host these devices as a secondary source of income.
2. The Pennsylvania legislative proposal sets a more favorable 16% tax rate for skill games, which is a significant reduction compared to the approximately 54% tax levied on devices in commercial casinos.
3. The financial industry, including banking and insurance, may benefit from the increased income of small businesses participating in the skill games industry, as a result of the proposed regulation.
4. The debate between skill games and commercial casinos in the industry highlights the potential for better financial prospects for small businesses and local communities when tax rates and licensing requirements are more feasible, as in the case of skill games.

Read also: