Conditional compensation for the affiliated corporation, our websites involved

Conditional compensation for the affiliated corporation, our websites involved

In the whirlwind of 2025, industry veterans predict a resurgence in deal activity due to expected drops in interest rates, less inflation, and easing regulatory hurdles. One common occurrence in these negotiations is the use of "seller earnouts," or contingent payments to the seller based on the acquired company achieving certain benchmarks post-acquisition.

Why It's Important

Although business decisions shouldn't always be driven by accounting implications, understanding how these contingent payments are accounted for can impact the final acquisition. Here are some key points to consider:

• Classification: Contingent payments can take various forms, such as earnouts, rollover equity, seller notes, or employment arrangements. Proper classification can affect how these arrangements are accounted for.
• Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805: After the acquisition closes, the buyer must address the complexities of ASC 805, "Business Combinations," when analyzing and accounting for contingent consideration arrangements.

Eight Indicators that Clarify Contingent Consideration vs. Post-Transaction Compensation

1. Continuing Employment: A seller's terms of continuing employment as a key employee may indicate the substance of a contingent consideration arrangement. If employment termination causes the forfeiture of contingent payments, the payments would be accounted for as compensation for services rendered post-acquisition.
2. Duration of Employment: If the period of employment required matches or surpasses the contingent payment period, it suggests that the contingent payments are compensation.
3. Level of Compensation: If employee compensation, other than contingent payments, is at a reasonable level compared to other key employees in the combined entity, it may indicate that the contingent payments are additional considerations instead of compensation.
4. Incremental Payments to Employees: If selling shareholders who do not become employees receive a smaller amount of contingent payments compared to selling shareholders who become employees, it suggests that the incremental payment to employees is compensation.
5. Number of Shares Owned: Selling shareholders who own a greater percentage of shares in the acquired company and continue as key employees may indicate that the arrangement is a profit-sharing plan intended for post-combination services.
6. Linkage to the Valuation: A contingent payment that is determined based on a multiple of earnings suggests that the obligation is contingent consideration in the business combination and intended to establish or verify the fair value of the acquiree.
7. Formula for Determining Consideration: Formulas used to determine contingent payments can help assess the substance of the arrangement. For example, payments based on a multiple of earnings are more likely to be contingent consideration, while payments made on a percentage of earnings are more likely to be profit-sharing plans.
8. Other Agreements and Issues: The terms of other arrangements with selling shareholders, such as non-compete agreements or property lease agreements, and the income tax treatment of contingent payments may indicate that contingent payments are not part of the purchase consideration.

When contingent payments are for a group of individuals, each individual should be evaluated separately. For example, an arrangement for a combine $5 million earout among a group of individuals, including shareholders, and the CEO, may likely be considered post-combination compensation if the payments are contingent on the continuation of their services for a specific period.

Proper accounting for contingent payments is crucial for ensuring compliance with ASC 805. If payment to the seller is contingent on the seller's continued employment post-transaction, this is usually seen as evidence that the arrangement represents post-transaction compensation. If payments are not forfeited upon termination of services, other factors must be considered for determining the proper accounting treatment.

[1] Accounting for Contingent Payments under ASC 805 - Contingent Consideration and Post-Transaction Compensation: https://www.accountancyage.com/2022/10/03/accounting-for-contingent-payments-under-asc-805-contingent-consideration-and-post-transaction-compensation/[2] Understanding Contingent Consideration under ASC 805 - Indicators of Contingent Consideration vs. Post-Transaction Compensation: https://www.accountingtoday.com/resources/understanding-contigent-consideration-under-asc-805-indicators-of-contingent-consideration-vs-posthorizontalacquisitioncompensation[3] AICPA - Contingent Consideration: https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2021/jan/20213341.html

1. The classification of contingent payments can influence how they are accounted for, as they can appear in various forms like earnouts, rollover equity, seller notes, or employment arrangements.
2. In the context of business combinations, the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805 must be addressed to evaluate and account for contingent consideration arrangements post-acquisition.
3. If a seller's terms of continued employment as a key employee suggest the substance of a contingent consideration arrangement, payments might be accounted for as compensation for services rendered post-acquisition.
4. If the period of employment required matches or surpasses the contingent payment period, it suggests that the contingent payments are compensation, not contingent consideration.
5. Reasonable levels of compensation for employees compared to other key employees in the combined entity can indicate that the contingent payments are additional considerations instead of compensation.
6. Incremental payments to employees compared to selling shareholders who do not become employees might suggest that the incremental payment to employees is compensation.
7. Selling shareholders who own a greater percentage of shares in the acquired company and continue as key employees may indicate that the arrangement is a profit-sharing plan intended for post-combination services.
8. Contingent payments that are determined based on a multiple of earnings are more likely to be contingent consideration in a business combination, whereas payments made on a percentage of earnings are more likely to be profit-sharing plans.
9. The terms of other arrangements with selling shareholders, income tax treatment of contingent payments, and the links to the valuation can also aid in determining whether contingent payments are post-transaction compensation or part of the purchase consideration.

Read also: