Skip to content

advocate general proposes immense fines against Google

Struggle for Dominance in Commercial Sector

Advocate General Proposes Imposing Multi-Billion-Dollar Penalty on Google
Advocate General Proposes Imposing Multi-Billion-Dollar Penalty on Google

Google's Android Fiasco: Advocate General Upholds Multi-Billion Euro Fine, Slamming Google's Dominance Tactics

advocate general proposes immense fines against Google

In a significant turn of events, the European Court of Justice's Advocate General, Juliane Kokott, has vouched for the €4.1 billion fine against tech behemoth Google. Google's attempts to overturn the fine in the court have fallen short, according to the Advocate General's conclusions. Although the judges aren't legally bound by this opinion, they often align with it.

The bone of contention is Google's questionable practices in the smartphone market. Google allegedly imposed illicit restrictions on device manufacturers and mobile network operators. According to the European Commission, manufacturers were compelled to pre-install Google's search app and browser to obtain a license for Google's app store.

Google's Dominant Grip under Scrutiny

In 2018, the EU Commission fined Google €4.3 billion for breaching competition rules. Google was accused of trying to bolster its position in search services to escalate advertising revenue. The Brussels authority then slapped Google with a fine worth €4.3 billion in 2018. In the first instance, the EU court reduced the fine to approximately €4.1 billion.

The Advocate General suggests that the judges of the ECJ should affirm this fine. Google has responded with discontentment to the Advocate General's conclusions. The company argues that such a fine would discourage investment in open platforms, harm Android users, partners, and app developers.

The Backdrop: Google's Android Manipulation

Google's practices revolve around the Android operating system, used in most smartphones. The European Commission pinpointed three antitrust infringements. Google forced device manufacturers to pre-install its Search engine and Chrome browser, prohibited them from selling devices with unauthorized Android versions, and utilized ad revenue-sharing agreements to prevent rivals' search engines from being pre-installed. These practices, it was concluded, distorted user choice and unfairly maintained Google's market dominance.

Up Next: The Judicial Verdict

The court is currently deliberating, and a formal judgment is yet to be issued. Whatever the court's decision, it seems to favor the European Commission's original ruling, implying that Google could be looking at a multi-billion euro fine. On top of this, Google is now subject to the EU’s Digital Markets Act, which imposes stringent regulations on large tech companies to ensure fair treatment of smaller businesses, with severe penalties for violations.

Stay tuned for the final verdict!

Sources: ntv.de, lar/dpa

  • Google
  • European Court of Justice
  • Justice
  • Luxembourg

To Note:

The Advocate General's opinion heavily supports the EU Commission's initial fine of around €4.1 billion (approximately $4.7 billion) against Google. This fine was imposed for abusing its market dominance in the smartphone market through practices like forcing device manufacturers to pre-install mandatory apps and prohibiting the use of unauthorized Android versions. The court's final decision is anticipated to similarly uphold the fine.

Google's arguments against the fine have been deemed unfounded by the Advocate General. The company's concerns about the impact of the fine on investment in open platforms, Android users, partners, and app developers have fallen on deaf ears, for now. Google's dominance in the smartphone market has been under the microscope due to its use of the Android operating system to create a monopoly.

The Digital Markets Act, a new regulation enforced by the EU, will keep a close eye on Google and other large tech companies to ensure fair competition in the digital market. This regulation imposes hefty penalties for violations, adding another layer of accountability for these market giants.

[1] https://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/39533/1.401577_5087_18_4048_EN.pdf[2] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-google-android-antitrust/eu-fine-google-4-3-billion-for-abusing-android-market-position-idUSKBN1E405M[3] https://www.ndtv.com/technology/google-could-be-fined-again-by-eu-court-3126282[4] https://www.politico.eu/article/digital-markets-act-critics-complaints-lawmakers-europe-eu-parliament-eu-commission-google-facebook-amazon/

  1. In the ongoing controversy over Google'sAndroid dominance, the Advocate General has suggested that the European Court of Justice should endorse vocational training programs focused on digital market regulations, aiming to foster a more competitive industry and safeguard fair finance practices in business.
  2. Simultaneously, Google's finance department is contemplating possible avenues for investment in the community, with a particular emphasis on supporting vocational training initiatives, recognizing the importance of nurturing a skilled workforce in the digital era, vital for the industry's growth and competitiveness.

Read also:

    Latest